Sinbad, the original Prince of Persia, must complete seven tasks in order to save the world from catastrophe. I really feel sorry for anyone who paid any money to see this poor excuse for a movie. The effects are outrageously cheap and nasty and unfortunately the acting is worse! Somebody spent money on making this move. It couldn't have been a lot but certainly some money and they were robbed blind. So are the people who are duped into seeing it. You could not even make a bad movie like this if you tried hard to. If you have not seen this movie yet, and you have the good sense to read reviews such as this….then still go and see it or watch it on DVD then you deserve everything you get. Which by the way, is nothing. Don't waste your time or your money. I was flipping through Netflix when I saw the cover art of a man duel wielding auto pistols. I new from the artwork alone this movie had serious problems. Against the warnings of the Netflix, I proceeded to watch the movie.<br/><br/>I don't need to really sit here and add what has been cited over and over about this film. To give you a rough idea on how badly the movie is written; one scene in the movie has Sinbad telling his tech that he plans to use the small 2 man sub. The tech explains the sub requires 2 people to operate it. So he takes Loa, a jungle warrior woman… obviously unskilled labor wasn't included in that conversation. During the scene inside the sub the actress playing Loa did her best to look confused or frightened, honestly I could not tell. The tech contacted the sub and told them that he was going to light up a button to press. Loa pushed that button. Great job! <br/><br/>Meanwhile I am certain that the crab scene (already on You Tube) will become the next internet meme, second only to "I took an arrow in the knee." So I won't complain about this movie being junk or garbage since I went against all the warning flags and watched it anyway.
Ululaeng replied
364 weeks ago